Logo: Feedburner Archive for the 'Performance Measurement' Category

Manage Results as a Value Chain

August 18th, 2008

Value chain methods used today lay an additional contrived structure over the business

Methods used today lay contrived value-chains over the business. The chain is not integrated within the business to control actual costs against value-created or to produce value within total managed business value. These value chains have never been successful in actual business management.

R-pM is the first method to manage value chains as part of the managed business

There has never been a method to organize the business to provide natural value chains until Result-performance Management (R-pM).

R-pM employs information technology to manage all the results of value produced by the business and all capital solutions that incur costs in performance to produce each result. R-pM builds result value chains with end-results of value as a link in the chain, within a higher-level set-result that is the final result from the chain. Result relationships chain the end-result links together and each end-result to the final set-result. Each end-result has a managed value that adds to the total final set-result value.

The costs and value-added is managed at each link in the chain to manage total chain value-added

Supplier input results are transformed by performance through internal business results to customer final results. Each solution utilized incurs a performance cost. The total of solutions utilized is the cost of creating result value at each link. R-pM manages the end-result value-added at each link and the set-result value-added for the complete chain. Result value chains manage the value, quality, volume, risk, and goals for each result and the final result. Result value chains enable supplier-customer integration and business collaboration. [more...]

Performance contains Business Cost, Capacity, and Effectiveness

June 26th, 2008

R-pM organizes business results, capital, and performance in one business structure

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes and manages one integrated enterprise business structure. The business structure is comprised of the result structure to organize and relate results to be produced, the capital structure to organize the capital that is available to produce specific results, and the performance structure that shows specific performance solutions deployed with rules and exceptions to produce specific results.

The capital structure organizes capital available as performance solutions

A key component of the business structure is the capital structure that organizes enterprise capital as specific performance solutions that are available to produce specific results. Capital is categorized to be managed properly by the specific human capabilities needed. Capital is classified by the way it must be integrated and utilized to produce results effectively. Organized capital is defined as modules for easy deployment to a new result and replication to define capital needed for a similar result set.

Performance Management manages the deployment of qualified solutions to produce results

R-pM replaces administration, undefined capital, and intangible assets with Capital Management get the most out of all capital and know and manage the return on all capital investments. Performance Management manages the deployment of capital from the capital structure to the performance structure to provide qualified solutions needed to produce specific results effectively, to know all costs against result value, to manage the capacity producing a volume of results, and to manage the effectiveness needed for high-quality results.

A well-managed enterprise must manage the cost, capacity, and effectiveness of all capital in order to produce value-quality results. The enterprise can use R-pM to reduce costs significantly, know and improve capital worth, and ensure beneficial capital development investments [more...]

R-pM is explained in BPM Business Performance Management Magazine

June 9th, 2008

Redefining BPM: Why Results and Performance Must Be Separated

BPM Business Performance Management magazine is the authority on new developments in business management. The lead article in the June 2008 issue of BPM magazine explains the new breakthrough to R-pM to organize the actual business for 21st century management to replace all 20th century management structures laid over the business like business performance management and business processes. R-pM is the only way to organizes and manage the actual business to clear away the 20th century organization structure and need to lay 20th century management structures over the business.

Learn more about R-pM in BPM Magazine

Learn more by reading the article by Harry Greene, the developer of R-pM, "Redefining BPM: Why Results and Performance Must Be Separated". The article can be reviewed and printed at the BPM management magazine website bpmmag.net [more...]

Capture capital and performance costs and assess capital worth

May 26th, 2008

Enterprises today do not know costs or worth of all capital utilized

Enterprises may capture some known costs for some known capital items like fixed assets or employees. But many capital items and costs remain unknown. Development costs may be captured for some other big-ticket capital items. In this case, costs usually include costs for other undefined solutions developed in the same project. Capital worth may be assessed for some tangible items, but cannot be done for all capital to know actual enterprise net worth.

Capital costs and worth are an integral part of the business and actual business management

The enterprise business consists of output results produced, capital deployed to be utilized for the result, and performance in the utilization of capital to incur costs and produce value in results. When the business is managed, results value and quality are managed, capital worth and investment returns are managed, and performance costs and effectiveness contributing to result value-added are managed. Results and capital are managed in result-capital development to plan and manage the result value-added to cover capital development costs and provide the return on investment.

R-pM is the only way to capture capital and performance costs and assess capital worth

Result-performance Management (R-pM) is the only way to organize and manage the actual business. All capital is managed to eliminate intangible assets, unknown costs, unknown capital and enterprise business worth, and unknown return on investments. Human and other capital is managed to control costs, invest only in capital needed, develop capital to create value, and maintain and increase capital worth [more...]

Business “Results” and “Performance” are not clearly defined today

March 20th, 2008

20th century business definitions are confusing and imprecise

What is your definition of an "enterprise" or the "business"? How do you or your performance management methods define "performance"? How do you define "result"?

Precise definitions are needed to organize and manage the business of the enterprise properly. Current definitions of performance mix performance activity together with output results and report and manage both as "performance". Current usage of the term "result" is as economic outputs that leave the enterprise.

The definition of the business conflicts with the definition of performance and results

Yet, the generally-accepted definition of the enterprise business as "the activity of providing goods and services" indicates that the enterprise business has two components:

  • The performance component in business activity
  • The result component in the goods, and services provided

20th century management is unable to organize and manage the two components of the business because performance and results are mixed together and managed as performance.

R-pM precisely defines business, performance, and results for 21st Century Management

Properly defining "performance" and "result" and then separating results from performance are the first steps to organizing the enterprise business for 21st Century Management [more...]

The missing business management information

February 14th, 2008

20th century management information is inaccurate and incomplete

20th century management used today can report enormous amounts of information against organization and management structures laid over the business. Large information systems process information on the various organization, planning, process, system, account, project, administration, performance, and reporting structures. Additional systems try to make sense of the information for management use.

But, since the actual business is not organized or managed, no information is reported on details of the actual business. Business data in value created, costs incurred, return on capital investments, business value-added, capital worth, and enterprise business worth remain unknown.

R-pM reports accurate and complete information on the actual business

R-pM organizes one business structure for one set of accurate, complete, and consistent management information on the actual business for organization, planning, direction, control, and reporting. Existing processes and systems are rationalized for use in the actual business. R-pM reports the actual business across the breath of the business in business results produced and to the depth of the business in the capital utilized in performance solutions to produce results.

R-pM reports result value-added, quality determinates, and capital worth

R-pM reports business management information not available today in result value, strategic result value creation, result value-added, performance costs, capital development costs and value-added and returns, capital worth, and many other performance indicators and result metrics that are not known today. R-pM provides complete and accurate information on the actual business and phases out the inaccurate, inconsistent, and incomplete management information provided today. R-pM enables management to use common sense to manage the actual business rather than trying to follow arbitrary rules imposed by structures laid over the business [more...]

How to maximize Benefits from existing Processes and Systems

January 10th, 2008

Existing business processes and systems can by improved significantly

Over the past 15 years corporations and other enterprises have implemented business processes and packaged information systems, like ERP, SCM, MRP, and CRM. These processes and systems provided general improvement, but usually still include extra costs and inefficiencies. Business processes and systems are laid over the actual business, rather than being utilized as a part of the business. Many corporations want to improve their process and system utilization, but lack a fundamentally-sound method.

Use R-pM to define processes and systems as a result value-quality chain

Result-performance Management (R-pM) provides the method by identifying and managing the actual business that lies hidden under the processes and systems. The business is defined by the economic output results produced and the capital, such as business processes and systems, utilized as specific performance solutions to produce specific results. R-pM redefines processes and systems as performance solutions that are utilized in result value-quality chains. R-pM minimizes the performance solutions utilized and maximizes the result produced at each link in the chain, so the corporation can manage value and quality across existing processes and systems.

Process and system performance is improved result by result across the result chain

R-pM makes business processes and systems a part of the actual business, instead of structures laid over the business. Business process and information system processing utilized to produce each result in the result chain is analyzed to integrate the process, eliminate waste, and produce a high value-quality result. Doing this, result by result, defines the actual business and maximizes the benefits from existing processes and systems [more...]

Manage Result Quality, not Performance Quality

November 12th, 2007

Today's business processes emphasize managing performance and "performance quality". But, people have difficulty defining "performance quality" and in identifying and correcting poor performance. If the business process output is not up to standard, it is difficult to identify what happened within the process and to prevent the problem from recurring.

"Quality" is not an attribute of performance. "Quality" is an attribute of the output result produced by performance effectiveness. We can see and determine the quality of the output result, where we cannot see or determine the quality of performance, if it is not witnessed. In order to manage quality we must manage each output result produced in the chain of results leading to the final process result. In order to manage the effectiveness of performance, we must manage the human and other performance solutions utilized to produce the result. A defective result in the chain it is caused by either a defective input result or ineffective performance. The chain is traced back to identify the defective result. Since performance solutions are managed, the ineffective solution can be corrected or replaced. But, this can only be done by managing result chains with Result-performance Management. [more...]

Manage and Develop Human Capital Worth

November 1st, 2007

Human resource and capital management of today essentially administer human resources as employees and develops human capital to meet general performance needs. Human capabilities required by the business are not defined or managed as capital. Knowledge solutions to develop human capital or for human capital to utilize solutions to produce results are not defined or managed as capital.

R-pM develops all capital, including human capital, to produce specific result value-added. Human capital in personnel learning, specific human capability development, and knowledge development is managed to add value to specific business results. Management knows the personnel, capability, and knowledge solutions utilized to create result value and the value-added to results. Management can assess the worth of human capital and plan human capital development to meet needs to increase the value of specific results or to produce valuable new results. Human capital has a stake in the enterprise business and knows that increasing result value-added increases human capital worth and justifies increases in human capital performance costs. [more...]

Replace Business Processes with Value-quality Chains

September 27th, 2007

20th century management lays a monolithic business process over the business. Results are mixed with performance and defined as "performance" preventing actual business management. The objective is to manage "performance quality", but costs, value, effectiveness, and quality are hidden in the process.

Rule No. 2 of 21st Century Management is to "Generate profits from a chain of managed value and quality". Result-performance Management (R-pM) replaces business processes with result value-quality chains to organize and manage the actual business to manage performance capacity to produce a result volume, performance effectiveness producing result quality, and performance costs creating result value. Result value-added is the result value less the total result cost. The actual business is managed to generate profits from a chain of managed result value-added. Contrived overlaid business processes are abolished. [more...]