R-pM organizes business results, capital, and performance in one business structure

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes and manages one integrated enterprise business structure. The business structure is comprised of the result structure to organize and relate results to be produced, the capital structure to organize the capital that is available to produce specific results, and the performance structure that shows specific performance solutions deployed with rules and exceptions to produce specific results.

The capital structure organizes capital available as performance solutions

A key component of the business structure is the capital structure that organizes enterprise capital as specific performance solutions that are available to produce specific results. Capital is categorized to be managed properly by the specific human capabilities needed. Capital is classified by the way it must be integrated and utilized to produce results effectively. Organized capital is defined as modules for easy deployment to a new result and replication to define capital needed for a similar result set.

Performance Management manages the deployment of qualified solutions to produce results

R-pM replaces administration, undefined capital, and intangible assets with Capital Management get the most out of all capital and know and manage the return on all capital investments. Performance Management manages the deployment of capital from the capital structure to the performance structure to provide qualified solutions needed to produce specific results effectively, to know all costs against result value, to manage the capacity producing a volume of results, and to manage the effectiveness needed for high-quality results.

A well-managed enterprise must manage the cost, capacity, and effectiveness of all capital in order to produce value-quality results. The enterprise can use R-pM to reduce costs significantly, know and improve capital worth, and ensure beneficial capital development investments [more...]

Redefining BPM: Why Results and Performance Must Be Separated

BPM Business Performance Management magazine is the authority on new developments in business management. The lead article in the June 2008 issue of BPM magazine explains the new breakthrough to R-pM to organize the actual business for 21^st century management to replace all 20^th century management structures laid over the business like business performance management and business processes. R-pM is the only way to organizes and manage the actual business to clear away the 20^th century organization structure and need to lay 20^th century management structures over the business.

Learn more about R-pM in BPM Magazine

Learn more by reading the article by Harry Greene, the developer of R-pM, "Redefining BPM: Why Results and Performance Must Be Separated". The article can be reviewed and printed at the BPM management magazine website bpmmag.net [more...]

20^th century business definitions are confusing and imprecise

What is your definition of an "enterprise" or the "business"? How do you or your performance management methods define "performance"? How do you define "result"?

Precise definitions are needed to organize and manage the business of the enterprise properly. Current definitions of performance mix performance activity together with output results and report and manage both as "performance". Current usage of the term "result" is as economic outputs that leave the enterprise.

The definition of the business conflicts with the definition of performance and results

Yet, the generally-accepted definition of the enterprise business as "the activity of providing goods and services" indicates that the enterprise business has two components:

• The performance component in business activity
• The result component in the goods, and services provided

20^th century management is unable to organize and manage the two components of the business because performance and results are mixed together and managed as performance.

R-pM precisely defines business, performance, and results for 21^st Century Management

Properly defining "performance" and "result" and then separating results from performance are the first steps to organizing the enterprise business for 21^st Century Management [more...]

Business processes and information systems laid over the business prevent management of costs, value, and quality

20^th century management lays monolithic business processes and information systems over the business to manage business performance. Results produced by the business are defined as performance and are not specifically identified and managed as a set or chain leading to final results that go to the customer. This prevents to business from managing the cost of producing a result, the result value, the result quality, and the result value added. Much time and money is wasted trying to reconcile ill-defined processes and systems for business collaboration.

Rule No. 2 of the 10 rules of 21^st Century Management: Generate profits from a chain of managed value and quality

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes the performance producing each result and organizes results as value-quality chains to manage cost-effective performance producing value-quality results to provide high value and high quality customer results.

R-pM produces customer business results from result value-quality chains

R-pM redefines business processes and information systems by the results produced and manages each result in the result value-quality chain starting from input results from the supplier, result value added along the enterprise result chain, and the final result to the customer. R-pM manages result value-added to contribute directly to the profit result. R-pM enables the business to integrate and manage the chain to help suppliers meet enterprise needs and to add more value by meeting customer needs [more...]

Today's business processes emphasize managing performance and "performance quality". But, people have difficulty defining "performance quality" and in identifying and correcting poor performance. If the business process output is not up to standard, it is difficult to identify what happened within the process and to prevent the problem from recurring.

"Quality" is not an attribute of performance. "Quality" is an attribute of the output result produced by performance effectiveness. We can see and determine the quality of the output result, where we cannot see or determine the quality of performance, if it is not witnessed. In order to manage quality we must manage each output result produced in the chain of results leading to the final process result. In order to manage the effectiveness of performance, we must manage the human and other performance solutions utilized to produce the result. A defective result in the chain it is caused by either a defective input result or ineffective performance. The chain is traced back to identify the defective result. Since performance solutions are managed, the ineffective solution can be corrected or replaced. But, this can only be done by managing result chains with Result-performance Management. [more...]

20^th century management lays a monolithic business process over the business. Results are mixed with performance and defined as "performance" preventing actual business management. The objective is to manage "performance quality", but costs, value, effectiveness, and quality are hidden in the process.

Rule No. 2 of 21^st Century Management is to "Generate profits from a chain of managed value and quality". Result-performance Management (R-pM) replaces business processes with result value-quality chains to organize and manage the actual business to manage performance capacity to produce a result volume, performance effectiveness producing result quality, and performance costs creating result value. Result value-added is the result value less the total result cost. The actual business is managed to generate profits from a chain of managed result value-added. Contrived overlaid business processes are abolished. [more...]

20^th century management provides many methods of cost accounting. None of the methods has been able to capture all costs and charge all costs to the proper entity to absorb costs. Known costs are captured from separate entities, such as employee, fixed asset, cash, and supplies. Costs are charged to entities like center, activity, station, etc, that show where the cost was incurred, but were not produced by the cost.

Management needs one entity that contains all the costs incurred by the business and one entity that was produced by the cost to absorb the cost properly. Result-performance Management (R-pM) provides the one entity "performance solution" that produces all costs. R-pM provides the one entity "result" that was produced by the cost to create value, and can properly absorb costs to know result value-added. Result-performance costing is the only method to know all performance costs, and to charge costs properly to the value of the specific result produced. [more...]

The 20^th Century Corporation has a problem defining value and managing value creation. Value is not organized and managed within the corporation as part of the routine. Methods and formulas are contrived to calculate numbers called "value". Business collaboration for shared value remains an elusive goal.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes the business as results, the economic outputs that contain value, and as performance solutions, the capital consumed to incur the cost of producing the value. Value is an attribute of each result and is determined and utilized as a routine management metric.

R-pM is the only to way to redefine monolithic business processes as manageable result value-quality chains. R-pM enables value-quality chains, value and value-added management, strategic value creation, business collaboration for shared value, and integration with supplier and customer value-quality chains. [more...]

Many enterprises have invested in quality management with TQM, ISO 9000, BPR, etc. But, how many are satisfied that they have the solution needed to manage quality across the enterprise? Many enterprises put a large effort into managing performance quality in their business processes.

Result-performance Management provides the means to know and manage the quality produced by everyone in the enterprise. The only way to manage enterprise quality is to manage the quality of results produced across the enterprise. Quality is an attribute of the result, not performance. Each performance solution utilized must be effective to produce a quality result. The quality in a business process cannot be managed by managing "performance quality". The business process must be replaced by a result quality chain to manage the effectiveness of performance producing each result and the quality of each result along the chain [more...]

What is business capital? Who is responsible for business capital? If these are unanswered question, the enterprise is not organized for 21st century management. Business capital is designed and utilized in performance solutions to produce a specific result, and cannot be used for results in general. Business capital includes three categories: business organization to plan and be ready to produce a result, business process to produce the actual result, and business data to access and update information about the result. With R-pM, organization, process, and data are defined precisely to be capital related to a specific result or a chain of results.

Business capital management is fundamental to manage the business. Other separately-managed human, facility, and management capital must be integrated with business capital to produce the result. This is not managed in conventional enterprises with significant unseen consequences. To see the consequences, business as usual must be compared with an unimagined organized and optimized business [more...]