Business processes and information systems laid over the business today prevent management of costs, value, and quality

20^th century management lays monolithic business processes and information systems over the business to manage business performance. Results produced by the business are defined as performance and are not specifically identified and managed as a set or chain leading to final results that go to the customer. This prevents to business from managing the cost of producing a result, the result value, the result quality, and the result value added. Much time and money is wasted trying to reconcile ill-defined processes and systems for business collaboration, since result chains cannot be organized or managed.

Rule No. 2 of the 10 rules of 21^st century business management: Generate profits from a chain of managed value and quality

21^st century business management organizes the capital investments available to be utilized in business performance, performance producing each result, and business output results as value-quality chains. This allows capital solutions to be utilized in cost-effective performance to produce value-quality results leading to high-value and high-quality customer results.

Customer results are outputs from managed result value-quality chains

Business management redefines business processes and information systems as process solutions by the results produced and manages each result in the result value-quality chain starting from input results from the supplier, result value added along the enterprise result chain, and the final result to the customer. Result value-added is managed across the chain to contribute directly to the profit result. The business can integrate and manage the chain to help suppliers meet enterprise input needs and to add more value by meeting customer needs. [more...]

Performance quality is managed today through structures laid over the business

Business process management teaches us to manage "performance quality". Other methods like six sigma lay structures over the business to capture and manage statistics related to quality. Quality is related to the process followed and the actions executed.

Quality is an attribute of the result for each result in a chain

Quality is not an attribute of performance. There is no such thing as performance quality. Quality is an attribute of the output result produced by business performance. Business management replaces business processes with result value-quality chains. Quality is managed for each result in the chain to produce quality in the final result. The business process contains only the business and information system processing solutions utilized to produce each result, result by result, along the chain.

Business management manages capital qualifications and performance effectiveness to produce quality in each result

Each solution implemented to produce a result, must first be qualified to produce a quality result. Solutions are then utilized in performance to produce the result quality. Performance effectiveness is the proper utilization and application of the solution qualifications to produce the planned quality of result. A defective result can be produced by a defective input result, a poorly qualified solution, or lack of performance effectiveness to properly apply solution qualifications to produce a result. All of this is planned, measured, and managed to ensure result quality along a result chain leading to a customer result that has the quality expected by the customer for the money paid that sets the perceived value of the result. [more...]

Effective business collaboration is prevented by 20^th century management

Each enterprise today lays a different collection of structures over the business, and each structure defines the enterprise differently, and captures inconsistently-defined data against the various structures. The 20^th century method of business collaboration is for businesses to lay the same process, information system, or data reconciliation and information reporting structure over the business. This is very expensive and still does not provide a satisfactory solution, since none of the collaborators actually organizes or manages the business.

Rule No. 9 of 21^st century business management: Collaborate to maximize shared value and minimize shared costs

Effective business collaboration and outsourcing requires that the business of each collaborator be managed. If the business is managed, there are common definitions for value creation, performance costs, quality levels, and other business measures that can be managed consistently for each business and across businesses. 21^st century business management requires that businesses be managed to enable collaboration by maximizing shared value and minimizing shared costs.

One simple business structure is used by all businesses to enable collaboration and integration

21^st century business management organizes the business as one consistent structure to define the results, capital investments, and capital utilization in performance to produce results. Results produced by the business are defined to know result volumes produced, result quality, result value, result costs, and result value-added across the business. The capital investments in the business are defined as capital solutions to know investment amounts and unamortized balances, investment returns, and capital solution worth. Capital solutions utilized to produce each result are defined to know performance costs incurred against the result and the value added to the result. The business structure can be managed within a business or across businesses to create result value-quality chains where each result is produced for the highest value and quality for the lowest cost. [more...]

The "alignment' problem hampers all enterprises today

All of us have heard of various alignment problems to align the organization, processes, information systems, human resource administration, financial and IT strategies, knowledge and capability development, accounts, capital development, outsourcing, supplier specifications, customer needs, tangible and intangible assets, etc with the business. All of these alignment problems are caused by rigid 20^th century organization and management structures that are laid over the business. The rigid structures conflict with the actual business, causing business change problems, and go further out of alignment as the business changes. Periodically new organization, accounting, process, administration, and other structures must be redesigned to align them closer to the business, and then the cycle is repeated.

All attempts to solve the alignment problem have failed and the problem remains unsolved today

Hundreds of books and solutions exist to solve the "alignment" problems, but alignment problems remain unsolved. Alignment problems can never be solved by laying new structures over the business, or by contriving methods to align overlaid structures with each other. The overlaid structures cannot be aligned with the business, because the actual business has never been defined or organized.

21^st century business management eliminates 20^th century alignment problems

The solution to the alignment problem is obvious. The generally-accepted definition of the enterprise business is "the activity of providing goods and services". The business has two components: "the activity of providing" and "the goods and services provided". We must organize the business to align the business activity in capital solutions utilized performance with the goods and services provided as results. This eliminates alignment problems by organizing the business for 21^st century business management. [more...]

The economic crisis is caused by the failure to manage the business and results as part of the business

The business is “investments in capital as solutions of worth utilized for costs and effectiveness of performance to produce value and quality in results”. In order to manage the business, three components of the business must be managed; the capital investments in the business as capital solutions of worth, performance of the business in utilization of specific capital solutions to incur costs and produce specific results, and output results of managed value and quality produced across the business.

20^th century management utilized by all corporations, financial institutions, and other enterprises today do not identify or manage specific capital solution investments as a complete data set and do not identify or manage specific output results produced as another data set. Financial institutions are not able to manage "asset value" in the worth of solutions in their investment portfolios. Corporations are not able to manage diverse businesses within the corporation as part of an integrated and managed corporate business. These are examples of causes cited for business failures and downturns that caused the economic crisis.

Result-performance Management organizes and manages the actual business and results as part of the business

R-pM organizes and manages one integrated enterprise business structure. The business structure is comprised of the result structure to organize and relate results required for business success, the capital structure to organize capital solutions available, and the performance structure to implement the capital that is utilized to produce specific results.

The key component of the business structure is the result structure that organizes economic outputs to be managed for the volume, value, and quality that lead to revenue, profit, and stakeholder value results. All enterprise management responsibilities are to produce specific results. Strategies are organized by the strategic results to produce in the strategic result structure. A well-managed enterprise business must manage the value and quality of all results produced by the utilization of specifically-qualified and cost-effective capital solutions. [more...]

The economic crisis shows the problems with 20^th century Business Process Management

Financial institutions and other corporations state that they have problems due the the failure to manage asset value, full operating costs, and the margins in outputs produced. This is part of the basic problem causing the economic crisis, failure to manage the business. One of the major features of 20^th century management, Business Process Management, prevents management of the business. Corporations must manage processes and cannot manage specific capital investments, output results produced, and the performance of capital solutions utilized to produce a result.

Business processes must be replaced by result chains to manage costs, value, and quality

Rule 2 for 21^st Century Management is to: Generate revenues from a chain of known value. The rule says to define the results produced and manage each result in the result value-quality chain; starting from input results from the supplier, proceeding through result value added along the corporate chain, and ending at the final result to the customer. Business processes used today do not allow this. The corporation must redefine business processes by identifying the results produced and the capital solutions utilized within the process to isolate the most cost-effective performance to produce the highest value-quality result. Results must be managed result by result within a set to produce the input result to the customer value-quality chain.

R-pM manages result value-quality chains as part of the managed business

Result-performance Management is the only method to manage the corporate business and result value-quality chains to know full costs to produce a result, the value of the result, the value-added by performance as well as capital solution qualifications, performance effectiveness, and the quality result by result in the chain. R-pM ensures that customers receive managed value and quality in goods and services from the corporation. [more...]

The financial crisis is caused by business performance problems

Business performance used by financial institutions, corporations, and other enterprises today is a problem. Business performance is defined to include both the performance of the business in the utilization of capital and the output results produced by the business. Capital utilized in performance and results produced are mixed together in business processes, performance management, key performance indicators (KPI), and other business performance structures laid over the business. Business performance improvement stresses performance, performance quality, and the flow of performance without managing improvement to business results produced by the performance or the investment in capital solutions utilized by the business to manage investment returns and capital worth (also called asset value).

Business performance management prevents actual business management

Structures laid over the business hide actual business capital solutions, actual business performance, and actual business results produced. The business changes with each change to a result produced or new investments in capital solutions utilized. Business change cannot be managed and conflicts with overlaid structures causing unsolvable 20^th century management and performance problems.

R-pM converts performance management to Result-performance Management

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes the actual business through organized and managed capital solutions utilized in performance to produce specific results in a business structure. The one integrated business structure is used to manage the business for each part of the enterprise. The organized businesses within a larger enterprise add up the enterprise business structure. R-pM manages each business in the enterprise and the complete enterprise business to eliminate performance problems through 21^st century management. [more...]

The current financial crisis shows the need for actual best business management practices

After every corporate financial, management, or governance crisis or scandal the call arises for best business management practices. However, nobody knows what real best business management practices are, since no one has any experience in actually organizing and managing a business. The practices installed are never actual best business management practices, but are a collections of rules and regulations or methods to better manage structures that hide the business and prevent actual business management.

20^th century best practices are the best of bad business practices

20^th century best business practices are a collection of organization, process, system, and administration structures laid over the business for a particular purpose, which have proven effective elsewhere. All 20^th century best business practices are bad business practices, because they add to enterprise overheads and costs, and do not help the enterprise to operate or manage the actual business.

R-pM provides the business definitions and structure for good best practices

Result-performance Management (R-pM) instills best practices across the business for 21^st Century Management. R-pM manages the business by managing the capacity, investment, qualifications, reliability, return, and worth of capital solutions; utilization, cost, effectiveness, uncertainty, and value-added of each capital solution in guided performance; and the volume, total cost, quality, risk, value, and value-added of each result produced. The set of solutions deployed and utilized to produce a result is defined as a capital module. The capital module that produces the best value-quality result can be defined as a best practice. All best practices are then built into the business structure to operate and manage the actual business.

The only way to prevent future corporate financial, management, and governance problems is to use R-pM to organize and manage the businesses. Governments that want to improve local business competitiveness significantly and prevent future crises, must investigate R-pM. [more...]

Value has no value in 20^th century management used today

Value is an impressive word. People talk of value propositions, strategic value, value chains, value creation, and value management as if they were actually measuring and utilizing value as a day-to-day business metric. But looking further, we find that value is calculated from a contrived business overlay or formula.

20^th century enterprise organization and management prevents the utilization of value as a day-to-day business metric.

R-pM organizes the business to make value a manageable and valuable result metric

We must organize the business through Result-performance Management (R-pM) for day-to-day 21^st Century Management. Value is an attribute of output results produced by the utilization of capital in performance across the business. The value of input results from suppliers, plus each result in the business result chain, equals the value imparted to customer results in customer willingness to pay. [more...]

Value chain methods used today lay an additional contrived structure over the business

Methods used today lay contrived value-chains over the business. The chain is not integrated within the business to control actual costs against value-created or to produce value within total managed business value. These value chains have never been successful in actual business management.

R-pM is the first method to manage value chains as part of the managed business

There has never been a method to organize the business to provide natural value chains until Result-performance Management (R-pM).

R-pM employs information technology to manage all the results of value produced by the business and all capital solutions that incur costs in performance to produce each result. R-pM builds result value chains with end-results of value as a link in the chain, within a higher-level set-result that is the final result from the chain. Result relationships chain the end-result links together and each end-result to the final set-result. Each end-result has a managed value that adds to the total final set-result value.

The costs and value-added is managed at each link in the chain to manage total chain value-added

Supplier input results are transformed by performance through internal business results to customer final results. Each solution utilized incurs a performance cost. The total of solutions utilized is the cost of creating result value at each link. R-pM manages the end-result value-added at each link and the set-result value-added for the complete chain. Result value chains manage the value, quality, volume, risk, and goals for each result and the final result. Result value chains enable supplier-customer integration and business collaboration. [more...]