20^th century management provides many methods of cost accounting. None of the methods has been able to capture all costs and charge all costs to the proper entity to absorb costs. Known costs are captured from separate entities, such as employee, fixed asset, cash, and supplies. Costs are charged to entities like center, activity, station, etc, that show where the cost was incurred, but were not produced by the cost.

Management needs one entity that contains all the costs incurred by the business and one entity that was produced by the cost to absorb the cost properly. Result-performance Management (R-pM) provides the one entity "performance solution" that produces all costs. R-pM provides the one entity "result" that was produced by the cost to create value, and can properly absorb costs to know result value-added. Result-performance costing is the only method to know all performance costs, and to charge costs properly to the value of the specific result produced. [more...]

The 20^th Century Corporation has a problem defining value and managing value creation. Value is not organized and managed within the corporation as part of the routine. Methods and formulas are contrived to calculate numbers called "value". Business collaboration for shared value remains an elusive goal.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes the business as results, the economic outputs that contain value, and as performance solutions, the capital consumed to incur the cost of producing the value. Value is an attribute of each result and is determined and utilized as a routine management metric.

R-pM is the only to way to redefine monolithic business processes as manageable result value-quality chains. R-pM enables value-quality chains, value and value-added management, strategic value creation, business collaboration for shared value, and integration with supplier and customer value-quality chains. [more...]

Results have historically been defined as a component of performance, or as economic outputs that reside outside of the enterprise. These definitions prevent the enterprise from managing the result as internal economic output.

Results must be separated from performance and defined as the internal economic outputs produced by enterprise performance. Results then are the basic building blocks of the enterprise, since all that the enterprise does must be focused on producing specific results. Result-performance Management (R-pM) defines and organizes the specific results produced by every human capital solution across the enterprise. This enables the enterprise to manage quality and value and the other attributes of each result [more...]

Many of the ten rules for 21st century management require that the enterprise manage performance costs and result value. The 20th century enterprise and conventional cost accounting and management methods capture "known costs" for various entities and then charge the costs to a contrived center, process, object, or activity and not against the value created. The 20th century enterprise is not organized to determine performance costs and result value.

In order to manage performance costs and result value the enterprise must organize the business for 21st century management. The enterprise cannot know and manage performance costs unless performance solutions are organized and managed. The enterprise cannot know and manage result value unless results are organized and managed. The enterprise cannot know and manage result value-added as a metric to optimize operations and the return on capital development investments, unless performance costs are managed against the result value created. [more...]