Value chain methods used today lay an additional contrived structure over the business

Methods used today lay contrived value-chains over the business. The chain is not integrated within the business to control actual costs against value-created or to produce value within total managed business value. These value chains have never been successful in actual business management.

R-pM is the first method to manage value chains as part of the managed business

There has never been a method to organize the business to provide natural value chains until Result-performance Management (R-pM).

R-pM employs information technology to manage all the results of value produced by the business and all capital solutions that incur costs in performance to produce each result. R-pM builds result value chains with end-results of value as a link in the chain, within a higher-level set-result that is the final result from the chain. Result relationships chain the end-result links together and each end-result to the final set-result. Each end-result has a managed value that adds to the total final set-result value.

The costs and value-added is managed at each link in the chain to manage total chain value-added

Supplier input results are transformed by performance through internal business results to customer final results. Each solution utilized incurs a performance cost. The total of solutions utilized is the cost of creating result value at each link. R-pM manages the end-result value-added at each link and the set-result value-added for the complete chain. Result value chains manage the value, quality, volume, risk, and goals for each result and the final result. Result value chains enable supplier-customer integration and business collaboration. [more...]

Today's business processes emphasize managing performance and "performance quality". But, people have difficulty defining "performance quality" and in identifying and correcting poor performance. If the business process output is not up to standard, it is difficult to identify what happened within the process and to prevent the problem from recurring.

"Quality" is not an attribute of performance. "Quality" is an attribute of the output result produced by performance effectiveness. We can see and determine the quality of the output result, where we cannot see or determine the quality of performance, if it is not witnessed. In order to manage quality we must manage each output result produced in the chain of results leading to the final process result. In order to manage the effectiveness of performance, we must manage the human and other performance solutions utilized to produce the result. A defective result in the chain it is caused by either a defective input result or ineffective performance. The chain is traced back to identify the defective result. Since performance solutions are managed, the ineffective solution can be corrected or replaced. But, this can only be done by managing result chains with Result-performance Management. [more...]

20^th century management lays a monolithic business process over the business. Results are mixed with performance and defined as "performance" preventing actual business management. The objective is to manage "performance quality", but costs, value, effectiveness, and quality are hidden in the process.

Rule No. 2 of 21^st Century Management is to "Generate profits from a chain of managed value and quality". Result-performance Management (R-pM) replaces business processes with result value-quality chains to organize and manage the actual business to manage performance capacity to produce a result volume, performance effectiveness producing result quality, and performance costs creating result value. Result value-added is the result value less the total result cost. The actual business is managed to generate profits from a chain of managed result value-added. Contrived overlaid business processes are abolished. [more...]

20^th century management provides many methods of cost accounting. None of the methods has been able to capture all costs and charge all costs to the proper entity to absorb costs. Known costs are captured from separate entities, such as employee, fixed asset, cash, and supplies. Costs are charged to entities like center, activity, station, etc, that show where the cost was incurred, but were not produced by the cost.

Management needs one entity that contains all the costs incurred by the business and one entity that was produced by the cost to absorb the cost properly. Result-performance Management (R-pM) provides the one entity "performance solution" that produces all costs. R-pM provides the one entity "result" that was produced by the cost to create value, and can properly absorb costs to know result value-added. Result-performance costing is the only method to know all performance costs, and to charge costs properly to the value of the specific result produced. [more...]

The 20^th Century Corporation has a problem defining value and managing value creation. Value is not organized and managed within the corporation as part of the routine. Methods and formulas are contrived to calculate numbers called "value". Business collaboration for shared value remains an elusive goal.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes the business as results, the economic outputs that contain value, and as performance solutions, the capital consumed to incur the cost of producing the value. Value is an attribute of each result and is determined and utilized as a routine management metric.

R-pM is the only to way to redefine monolithic business processes as manageable result value-quality chains. R-pM enables value-quality chains, value and value-added management, strategic value creation, business collaboration for shared value, and integration with supplier and customer value-quality chains. [more...]

Many enterprises have invested in quality management with TQM, ISO 9000, BPR, etc. But, how many are satisfied that they have the solution needed to manage quality across the enterprise? Many enterprises put a large effort into managing performance quality in their business processes.

Result-performance Management provides the means to know and manage the quality produced by everyone in the enterprise. The only way to manage enterprise quality is to manage the quality of results produced across the enterprise. Quality is an attribute of the result, not performance. Each performance solution utilized must be effective to produce a quality result. The quality in a business process cannot be managed by managing "performance quality". The business process must be replaced by a result quality chain to manage the effectiveness of performance producing each result and the quality of each result along the chain [more...]

What is business capital? Who is responsible for business capital? If these are unanswered question, the enterprise is not organized for 21st century management. Business capital is designed and utilized in performance solutions to produce a specific result, and cannot be used for results in general. Business capital includes three categories: business organization to plan and be ready to produce a result, business process to produce the actual result, and business data to access and update information about the result. With R-pM, organization, process, and data are defined precisely to be capital related to a specific result or a chain of results.

Business capital management is fundamental to manage the business. Other separately-managed human, facility, and management capital must be integrated with business capital to produce the result. This is not managed in conventional enterprises with significant unseen consequences. To see the consequences, business as usual must be compared with an unimagined organized and optimized business [more...]

Results have historically been defined as a component of performance, or as economic outputs that reside outside of the enterprise. These definitions prevent the enterprise from managing the result as internal economic output.

Results must be separated from performance and defined as the internal economic outputs produced by enterprise performance. Results then are the basic building blocks of the enterprise, since all that the enterprise does must be focused on producing specific results. Result-performance Management (R-pM) defines and organizes the specific results produced by every human capital solution across the enterprise. This enables the enterprise to manage quality and value and the other attributes of each result [more...]

Many of the ten rules for 21st century management require that the enterprise manage performance costs and result value. The 20th century enterprise and conventional cost accounting and management methods capture "known costs" for various entities and then charge the costs to a contrived center, process, object, or activity and not against the value created. The 20th century enterprise is not organized to determine performance costs and result value.

In order to manage performance costs and result value the enterprise must organize the business for 21st century management. The enterprise cannot know and manage performance costs unless performance solutions are organized and managed. The enterprise cannot know and manage result value unless results are organized and managed. The enterprise cannot know and manage result value-added as a metric to optimize operations and the return on capital development investments, unless performance costs are managed against the result value created. [more...]